Please show your support of Waihekepedia by adding a link to us from your web site. Waihekepedia T Shirts now available at the Ostend Market
Difference between revisions of "The 2005 Foot and Mouth disease hoax"
Palm Beach (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In May 2005, in a suspected capping stunt, a letter was sent to the New Zealand Prime Minister claiming that foot and mouth disease had been released on Waiheke Island and would be released elsewhere unless money was paid and tax reforms made. A full agricultural exotic disease response was initiated. | + | In May 2005, in a [http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_rural_story_skin/546221%3fformat=html suspected capping stunt], a letter was sent to the New Zealand Prime Minister claiming that foot and mouth disease had been released on Waiheke Island and would be released elsewhere unless money was paid and tax reforms made. A full agricultural exotic disease [http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0505/S00104.htm response] was initiated. Movement controls were imposed on island livestock and animals were tested every 48 hours for symptoms of the virus. A positive return would devastate New Zealand's agricultural exports. The economic cost of the alert has been [http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_rural_story_skin/547580%3fformat=html extensive] regardless of the outcome. After three weeks of testing, no infected animals were detected and the response staff were stood down and was announced as a hoax. |
| + | |||
| + | [http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_rural_story_skin/545241%3fformat=html TVNZ report] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:26, 27 March 2009
In May 2005, in a suspected capping stunt, a letter was sent to the New Zealand Prime Minister claiming that foot and mouth disease had been released on Waiheke Island and would be released elsewhere unless money was paid and tax reforms made. A full agricultural exotic disease response was initiated. Movement controls were imposed on island livestock and animals were tested every 48 hours for symptoms of the virus. A positive return would devastate New Zealand's agricultural exports. The economic cost of the alert has been extensive regardless of the outcome. After three weeks of testing, no infected animals were detected and the response staff were stood down and was announced as a hoax.